Hello,

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Michael Jennings <mjenni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Boris!  I object to referring to Terminology as an "upgrade"
> to Eterm since they're completely different products (and Eterm is
> way, way more stable and more performant, at least for the time
> being), but I'll happily accept bug fixes.  :-)

I am interested by which benchmark eterm out perform terminology. I
have been running benchmark against all the terminal that are packaged
on my distribution (eterm isn't) and only urxvt does outperform
terminology by something like 5 or 10% (I know why and where to target
to get that little boost, but it's way to much work to win something
that small). So if you have any identified slow path, I am interested
to look at it and eventually fix it :-)

Being who I am, this will absolutely not help you for the stability
part of course ! :-D
-- 
Cedric BAIL

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infragistics Professional
Build stunning WinForms apps today!
Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. 
Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to