On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:06:30 -0400 Chris Michael <devilho...@comcast.net> said:
> On 09/29/2014 07:47 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:52:23 +0200 Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> said: > > > >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> > >> wrote: > >>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 23:44:32 +0200 Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> said: > >>>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Lucas De Marchi > >>>> <lucas.de.mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> Em 28/09/2014 08:46, "Graham Gower" <graham.go...@gmail.com> escreveu: > >>>>>> I've attempted to build using the easy_efl.sh script and received the > >>>>>> build error referenced in the subject (full build log follows > >>>>>> message). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Is there a particular version of udev that is required now, but hasn't > >>>>>> been put in the autoconf goo? I have udev 182 on a linux distro > >>>>>> without systemd. > >>>>> > >>>>> From > >>>>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/src/libudev/libudev.sym?id=946f1825751919a176cd0039002a514de0c9c70f > >>>>> > >>>>> libudev 199 > >>>> > >>>> Question as always how many distribution ship this library and how > >>>> many don't. Should we make 199 mandatory or should we just disable the > >>>> code that require 199 (I guess it is related to wayland). > >>> > >>> since systemd and udev merged... a lot seem to have stopped updating udev > >>> at all and may b e on a multi-year-old udev (eg 2011). so our choices are > >>> to force an upgrade or work on these distros, or we need a way to emulate > >>> this udev call inside eeze iof udev is older. that means someone has to > >>> do the emulation code work there. > >> > >> Do we really need to ? We could just disable Wayland support if udev > >> is to old, as I think that is the only think that rely on it. The > >> question is more what about other system than Linux. > > > > that makes for a poor eeze api that may or may not work based on a hidden > > udev version at compile time of eeze. > > > > Well, perhaps for the moment we can detect the udev version and just > #ifdef the internal eeze code to skip that function call. Fixes the > build problem while Not breaking code for people that have a sane udev > version. Thoughts ?? but downside is we have an eeze fn that now is broken for some and not others... and then when some try wayland things mysteriously fail.. we'll hit this sooner or later in one form or another. best get it sorted now while fresh. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Videos for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
