Hello.

On 04/02/15 02:24, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> Hi, thanks for the 1.14 release cycle suggestion.
> I am ok with 4 weeks but we didn't use those 4 weeks usefully as we still
> have a lot of pending tasks IMO.
> Need to find a better way of handling it.

I'm open for suggestions how we can improve this. So far I tried to
motivate people by summarizing what important bugs are still open and
what they can do.

My take away for this is that with such a general call everybody
expected someone else  will jump in.

Poking some people about bugs that are in their expertise area helped a
bit better but obviously only for one bug.

regards
Stefan Schmidt


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to