On 24 September 2015 at 17:20, Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Furthermore, speaking of tmpstr, I'm annoyed it's still in, yes,
> especially since when it was discussed on the ML the consensus was that
> it sucks and shouldn't get in (Adrien, Kolesa and myself objecting, you
> calling us idiots and not responding at some point). We don't follow up
> on discussions enough, and that's what happens, things stay in. It
> should have been discussed in advance, but whatever.

In this case isn't preferable to reopen the issue on phab (or open a
new one) and discuss there so it isn't lost?

-- 
http://indefini.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to