On 7 April 2016 at 13:58, Cedric BAIL <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 06/04/16 11:51, Simon Lees wrote: > >> On 04/06/2016 07:04 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > >>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 19:54:06 -0300 Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira > >>> <[email protected]> said: > >>>> 2016-04-05 19:50 GMT-03:00 Simon Lees <[email protected]>: > >>>>> I don't like the idea of having opening brackets without close > brackets > >>>>> either. > >>>> > >>>> This will make MANY IDEs mismatch the parens. > >>> > >>> i'd say thats a broken ide because its inside of a STRING quote... if > an ide > >>> is matching ()'s inside strings... its odd and making assumptions it > >>> shouldn't/can't as it doesn't know the string is actually code or a > specific > >>> format to go handling ('s matching )'s > >> > >> Yes well a good ide knows that but some of the less smart ones don't > > > > I doubt this claim is true. All IDEs that are syntax aware should be > > able to deal with this. > > > > With that being said, I don't like the syntax. I much prefer the Qt > > syntax tbh. > > I do also prefer Qt syntax. Added benefit some people will be already > use to it. Maybe we should just follow what they do there and support > their subset. > > Makes sense, if our vpaths have the same meaning as Qt's.
-- Jean-Philippe André ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
