On 01/08/16 17:07, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> The extra Makefiles to allow building some libraries separately have
> been broken for a while now. Nobody updated them when changes happened.
> The normal problem when trying to have two build setups in one tree.
>
> I just gave it another go and ecore, edje, eio and elementary failed for me.
>
> Many of them also fail from a tarball build because they include
> Makefile_Eolian_Subbuild_Helper.am which never makes it into the tarball.
>
> cd ../../.. && /bin/sh /home/stefan/EFL/efl/tmp/efl-1.18.0-beta1/missing
> automake-1.15 --gnu src/lib/ecore/Makefile
> configure.ac:284: warning: The 'AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' macro is deprecated,
> and its use is discouraged.
> configure.ac:284: You should use the Autoconf-provided 'AC_PROG_MKDIR_P'
> macro instead,
> configure.ac:284: and use '$(MKDIR_P)' instead of '$(mkdir_p)'in your
> Makefile.am files.
> automake-1.15: error: cannot open <
> src/Makefile_Eolian_Subbuild_Helper.am: No such file or directory
> Makefile:1644: recipe for target 'Makefile.in' failed
> make: *** [Makefile.in] Error 1
>
>
> All in all I think it would make sense to remove this extra Makefiles
> all together and stay with the one big Makefile build for 1.18. I know
> the build times are frustrating and we might want to switch back to a
> non aggregated Makefile to allow easier rebuilds of specific libs only.
>
> Having a second, non working, build setup in tree for the release is
> something I would like to avoid though.
>
> Comments?

That's what I've been saying since they were introduced. Two build 
systems is a bad idea, we should just stay with single build until we 
move to split.

--
Tom.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to