On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 23:23:39 -0200 Felipe Magno de Almeida <felipe.m.alme...@gmail.com> said:
> On Dec 4, 2016 10:55 PM, "Jean-Philippe André" <j...@videolan.org> wrote: > > > > Nah I totally agree with Vincent that the error message is cryptic. > > Anyway as far as I remember shared objects are not a viable solution until > we change the calling mechanism (function & data resolution) to be > thread-safe, rather than locking the entire pool of shared objects for the > entire duration of a call. > > > Indeed. just like we discussed in Korea. the recursive mutex must go. i then invite you to actually implement all the fine-grained locks for every class and object now and into the future and never to get it wrong. are you going to do that? -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
