On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:08:41 +0000 Michael Blumenkrantz <[email protected]> said:
> On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 10:42:50 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:33:28 -0200 Luis Felipe Strano Moraes > > <[email protected]> said: > > > > > Guys, (specially raster) > > > > > > just did today the release of 1.7.5, Mike (discomfitor/zmike) was talking > > > to me about also doing a new minor release of Enlightenment so the bug > > > fixes that have been made already to the stable branch can be easily > > > obtained by users. Problem is, according to him we are unable to use > > > 0.17.1 as the proper version. > > > > wtf? of course we can do 0.17.1 > > > > > So what I would like to know is: > > > > > > 1) (raster-only) Why not using 0.17.1? > > > 2) What should we use if that is in fact not available? 0.17.0-1 was > > > suggested on IRC but I find it quite confusing. We could go with 0.17.0.1 > > > but honestly, we already have e16 version 1.0, so enlightenment is kinda > > > starting to have a really confusing numbering system going. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > --lf > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Luís Felipe Strano Moraes > > > http://www.strano.org > > > > > > last I heard you wanted to do 0.17.1 out of trunk, not branches. we can do it from anywhere... :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912 _______________________________________________ Enlightenment-release mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-release
