On Wednesday, 28 July 2004, at 10:18:37 (+0800), Didier Casse wrote: > Certain modules do not have specs. Where's elicit/engage specs for > instance?
The apps don't all have them yet. I'm getting there. > Btw use "License" instead of "Copyright" :-) > > Excerp from > http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/developers-guide/ch-rpm-building.html: > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > License > One of GPL, LGPL, BSD(-like), Artistic, etc. Most old packages > erroneously call this the "Copyright" field. This is incorrect but the two > are synonyms for each other. Fix old packages to have the correct tag if > found. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- While I do not consider Fedora the deity of All Things RPM any more than I did RedHat, I will mention it to Jeff and see what he says. But calling something both "incorrect" and "a synonym" makes no sense; both cannot be true. If neither has been deprecated or obsoleted, and they're synonyms, both are equally valid. Besides, I've seen RedHat packages that use "Copyright:" too. :) Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "A slipping gear could let your M203 grenade launcher fire when you least expect it. That would make you quite unpopular in what's left of your unit." -- In the August 1993 issue, page 9, of PS magazine ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
