On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:20:53 +1000, David Seikel wrote: > The menu spec is a huge monstosity, not all of it is supported yet, but > will be eventually. The largest parts that are not currently supported > involve deletions, movements, and other changes.
You're too polite. It's a mess! Personally, I think the spec is all wrong. I would have made everything directory-based, not config based. All icons in one place, all themes in one place, all menu and sub-menu categories in one tree, and all .desktop files in one place. Then, I would symlink to the relevant .desktop files from whichever tree I want an app to appear. But, that's too simple, right? Of course, that's too utopian. KDE and Gnome have already made their directory structure too convoluted with its private icons and themes. Took me almost three weeks to set up my local application.menu file so that my xdg menu would look nice!!! -- Peter +++++ Do not reply to this email, it is a spam trap and not monitored. I can be reached via this list, or via jabber: pete4abw at jabber.org ICQ: 73676357 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
