On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:10:36 -0400 Tony Lill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> >>>>> "Carsten" == Carsten Haitzler <(The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > >>>>> writes: > > Carsten> On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 20:31:14 -0400 Tony Lill > Carsten> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > >> I got another question about ibox. Is there some way to make the window > >> title pop up when you mouse over the icons? Seriously, 20 identical > >> xterm icons make it a waste of space. > > Carsten> try the ibox configuration. > > Ah, found it. Two problems though... With the icon box on the left side > of the desktop, half the title is off the screen. The other is that if I > ask for Display Name, the firefox icons show something useful and the > xterm icons show '?', and if I choose Display Title, the opposize > happens. It would be nice if I could select multiple info sources, and > you showed whichever one had some useful info. yes - vertical display isn't great :) otherwise, right now, patches accepted. the reason ibox sucks is - i never use it. i don't minimize things. i use virtual desktops. i group my windows by activity and use small fonts so they all are visible and don't overlap - i just flip desktops. > >> On a semi-related note, is there some way to get the window list sorted > >> alphabetically? Or how about getting it to stop putting the windows on > >> the "current" desktop at the top? "current" window makes no sense for > >> minimized windows in any case, and half the time when I pull it up, my > >> cursor is pointing to the bottom of the list in any case. > > Carsten> no - the client list is "as is". - it was actually a hack before > Carsten> we have an ibox or any way to get back minimized windows to get > Carsten> to them. it's not a very well rounded feature and might just get > Carsten> nuked as it was temporary and the work needed to make it decent > Carsten> might not be worth it as the alt-tab winlist is more flexible > Carsten> and can order, group and so on more intelligently. > > Please no, it's about the most useful feature in enlightnement, > IMHO. I'd rather you throw away the ibox. well the problem is - it is an unmaintained ancient piece of code. it'd need a fair bit of work to bring it up to speed. checkboxes for "is this active" is a bit bad - imho. for starters. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
