On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 13:11:25 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

| On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:13:00 +0900 Yasufumi Haga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| babbled:
| 
| my guess is the AC_PATH_XTRA macros shipped with your distro don't cover the
| locations x can be installed - like /usr/X11R6/... but your distro puts them
| there. you could set CFLAGS and LDFLAGS to ass -I/usr/X11R6/include and
| -L/usr/X11R6/lib to each. since you have things installed in :"non-standard
| places" its often needed to do this. since xorg's move to use /usr instead
| of /usr/X11R6 by default things are getting less friendly to
| supporting /usr/X11R6 "out of the box" without extra env vars.

But I compiled imlib2 before compiling evas last night. configure.in of imlib2 
has  AC_PATH_XTRA, too:
  $ pwd
  /home/fumi/src/e17/e17/libs/imlib2  
  $ grep -i AC_PATH_XTRA *
  configure.in:  AC_PATH_XTRA

and imlib2 was built normally. The config.log file created by autogen.sh of 
imlib2 has these lines:
  configure:20130: checking for X
  configure:20360: result: libraries /usr/X11R6/lib, headers /usr/X11R6/include

I wonder if it didn't mean AC_PATH_XTRA functioned correctly.
AC_PATH_XTRA seems to be used by Eterm and E16, too.
If AC_PATH_XTRA really doesn't cover "/usr/X11R6/lib", is it possible to build 
imlib2, Eterm, and E16 normally?

| > Hello Massimo, Raster
| > Thanks for your replies.
| > Sorry, this mail is a bit long.
| > 
| > On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:01:44 +0900
| > Yasufumi Haga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > 
| > | Hello Massimo
| > | 
| > | On Sat, 09 Jun 2007 17:02:42 +0200
| > | Massimo Maiurana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > | 
| > | | Yasufumi Haga, il 09/06/2007 15:51, scrisse:
| > | | > Hi all
| > | | > 
| > | | > I'm trying to compile evas which I checked out just now, 
| > | | > but it's complaining that ld can't find "-lX11" :
| > | | 
| > | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/X11R6/lib# ldconfig -p | grep libX11
| > | |         libX11.so.6 (libc6) => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
| > | |         libX11.so (libc6) => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so
| > | | 
| > | | can you see the same output from ldconfig?
| > | 
| > | Yes, here's my result:
| > | 
| > | $ sudo /sbin/ldconfig -p | grep libX11
| > |         libX11.so.6 (libc6) => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
| > |         libX11.so (libc6) => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so
| > | 
| > | $ slocate libX11
| > | warning: slocate: warning: database /var/lib/slocate/slocate.db' is more
| > | than 8 days old warning: Please make sure the daily cron job is enabled
| > | in /etc/updatedb.conf /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
| > | /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.a
| > | /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2
| > | /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so
| > | 
| > | In fact I'm using the distribution upgraded on April 13 this year, but
| > | after upgrading it, I checked out e17 tree from the CVS and built it
| > | successfully on May 13. Also I posted an update of the ja.po file for the
| > | e17 I built to E-Intl ML on that day. Now I'm using the e17 built at that
| > | time. It's very nice! 
| > | 
| > | | maybe you upgraded your X installation and now libraries are on a
| > | | different path?
| > | 
| > | So, In that sense, I haven't changed my distribution including X since I
| > | built e17 last time. I wonder why...
| > 
| > I think I found something.
| > Here's a piece of config.log created by autogen.sh in evas tree I checked 
out
| > today: autogen.sh seems to be unable to find my X11 library.
| > 
| > 
| > configure:24138: checking X11/X.h usability
| > configure:24150: gcc -c -g  conftest.c >&5
| > configure:24156: $? = 0
| > configure:24160: test -z 
| >                          || test ! -s conftest.err
| > configure:24163: $? = 0
| > configure:24166: test -s conftest.o
| > configure:24169: $? = 0
| > configure:24179: result: yes
| > configure:24183: checking X11/X.h presence
| > configure:24193: gcc -E  conftest.c
| > configure:24199: $? = 0
| > configure:24219: result: yes
| > configure:24254: checking for X11/X.h
| > configure:24261: result: yes
| > configure:24274: checking whether software x11 backend is to be built
| > configure:24292: result: yes
| > configure:24466: gcc -o conftest -g   conftest.c   -LNONE -lX11 >&5
| > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lX11
| > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
| > configure:24472: $? = 1
| > configure: failed program was:
| > | /* confdefs.h.  */
| > | 
| > | #define PACKAGE_NAME ""
| > | #define PACKAGE_TARNAME ""
| > | #define PACKAGE_VERSION ""
| > | #define PACKAGE_STRING ""
| > | #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT ""
| > | #define PACKAGE "evas"
| > | #define VERSION "0.9.9.038"
| > | #define STDC_HEADERS 1
| > | #define HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H 1
| > | #define HAVE_SYS_STAT_H 1
| > | #define HAVE_STDLIB_H 1
| > | #define HAVE_STRING_H 1
| > | #define HAVE_MEMORY_H 1
| > | #define HAVE_STRINGS_H 1
| > | #define HAVE_INTTYPES_H 1
| > | #define HAVE_STDINT_H 1
| > | #define HAVE_UNISTD_H 1
| > | #define HAVE_DLFCN_H 1
| > | #ifdef __cplusplus
| > | extern "C" void std::exit (int) throw (); using std::exit;
| > | #endif
| > | #define HAVE_ALLOCA_H 1
| > | #define HAVE_ALLOCA 1
| > | #define MODULE_ARCH "linux-gnu-i686"
| > | #define HAVE_FONTCONFIG 1
| > | #define HAVE_DLADDR 1
| > | #define HAVE_FNMATCH 1
| > | /* end confdefs.h.  */
| > | 
| > | /* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error.  */
| > | #ifdef __cplusplus
| > | extern "C"
| > | #endif
| > | /* We use char because int might match the return type of a gcc2
| > |    builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply.  */
| > | char XOpenDisplay ();
| > | int
| > | main ()
| > | {
| > | XOpenDisplay ();
| > |   ;
| > |   return 0;
| > | }
| > 
| > I built e16 three days ago (last Wednesday), and It finished without any
| > error. In addition, I tried compiling Eterm 0.9.4 again just now and it's
| > finished with no error. 

Regards.
--Yasufumi

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to