On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:24 PM, BT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:02:06 -0300 > "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbieri-at-profusion.mobi |enlightenment|" <...> > wrote: > > >> > Instead, performance is much worse. >> > Events scheduled for 0.1 sec are running at about 1 per sec, with the CPU >> > maxed out >> > (while images are being moved on the screen). >> > >> > When enabling framebuffer, have I forgotten to do something? >> >> > >> x11-16 is sometimes 2 times faster than regular x11, it depends on >> what you are doing. There is no fb-16 yet (willing to write it? ;-)). >> >> However in your case it's much slower, that shouldn't be the case. It >> would be great to try "expedite" with -e x11 and x11-16 and report, >> at least, the first 4 tests values. >> >> As for framebuffer an x11, they should be almost the same. We just >> tested on Freescale's imx31 at 480x640 and it's not that difference. >> X11 is not as bad as people claim. >> >> > > Willing to try expedite .. but I have all kinds of E17 stuff here, dont see > any expedite. Where do I get it from? > Not obviously in any snapshot.
it's in SVN: http://svn.enlightenment.org/svn/e/trunk/expedite/ -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
