Am Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:17:20 +1000 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The
Rasterman):

> On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:27:14 +0200 Andreas Volz <li...@brachttal.net>
> said:
> 
> > Am Fri, 10 Apr 2009 01:59:39 +0200 schrieb Vincent Pomageot:
> > 
> > Looks nice! I'll try it next week. For my embedded application I use
> > a minimal self written widget toolkit on top of eflmm, but I really
> > need to put more work into it...
> > 
> > Maybe I'll start a eflmm wrapper for Elementary. Any ideas how
> > stable the API currently is?
> 
> very stable api.

Ok, so I may start to write a C++ wrapper. :-)

Another question:

Is Elementary meant to replace the internal E widgets in the long term?
This would save the need to maintain two widgets sets and also ease the
theme creating.

> > I decided against ETK or EWL because they were not fitting for me.
> > Several reasons...
> > 
> > My application has no mouse or touchscreen input. I control it with
> > a external joypad device. So my widgets are optimized to be
> > controlled from a joystick dispatcher. So all widgets needs to be
> > fully controlled with the public API and not only by mouse or
> > keyboard. Is this possible with Elementary?
> 
> as a matter of fact.. no. not currently. elementary currently is
> entirely designed around touchscreen input. maybe in future it will
> gain control from keypads/keyboard focus etc. etc. but right now its
> pretty much touchscreen.

Ok, I'll test if it fits for my purposes.

regards
Andreas

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and 
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. 
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to