On 10/27/2010 10:12 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:14:41 +1000 David Seikel<onef...@gmail.com> said: > >> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:43:18 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) >> <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:35:23 +1000 David Seikel<onef...@gmail.com> >>> said: >>> >>>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:01:16 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) >>>> <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> such bugs should get fixed. aqpps return 0 when they exited >>>>> cleanly with no error. anything else is an error. enlightenment, >>>>> unlike everyone else, doesn;t ignore it. it bothers you. this >>>>> solves the "why the hell did that window just vanish?" question. >>>>> mind you - e could do a much better ui than pop up a dialog. e >>>>> should really have a proper notification queue/log/stack thing at >>>>> some point. will worry about that for e18. >>>> >>>> Now you tell me. :-P >>> >>> the dialog is ok for now. better than not knowing what happened to >>> the app. apps that dont exit with a 0 exit code are saying "i had an >>> error". i'd bet there are quite a few that dont do this right. this >>> is a good opportunity to file bug reports with those apps so they >>> clean up their act. they are just like functions that do this: >>> >>> int dothing(int blah) { >>> // do thing here >>> return; >>> } >>> >>> it's a bug. we shouldnt be hiding bugs. we should be bringing them >>> out and passing them to the right place to be fixed - in this case >>> the apps in question. :) >>> >>> just saying that we could have a less intrusive way of >>> logging/notifying the user than a dialog they have to dismiss in the >>> middle of their screen. :) >> >> I meant "now you tell me after I wrote that dialog years ago according >> to your desires at the time". lol > > thats what i said - dialog is fine. we have no alternative mechanism right > now. > we'd need a nice log + notification thing. we probably want one in the end > anyway. but what you did was just fine. >
Since there is no configuration option to suppress the output how difficult would it be for me to simply patch it out of E for now? Any tips on where to look in the code base? Thanks, Tex. P.S. Gratuitous screen shot of our new PCLinuxOS Enlightenment ISO. http://i52.tinypic.com/n69ngl.png ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in U.S. and Canada $10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users