On 10/27/2010 10:12 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:14:41 +1000 David Seikel<onef...@gmail.com>  said:
>
>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:43:18 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
>> <ras...@rasterman.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:35:23 +1000 David Seikel<onef...@gmail.com>
>>> said:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:01:16 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
>>>> <ras...@rasterman.com>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> such bugs should get fixed. aqpps return 0 when they exited
>>>>> cleanly with no error. anything else is an error. enlightenment,
>>>>> unlike everyone else, doesn;t ignore it. it bothers you. this
>>>>> solves the "why the hell did that window just vanish?" question.
>>>>> mind you - e could do a much better ui than pop up a dialog. e
>>>>> should really have a proper notification queue/log/stack thing at
>>>>> some point. will worry about that for e18.
>>>>
>>>> Now you tell me.  :-P
>>>
>>> the dialog is ok for now. better than not knowing what happened to
>>> the app. apps that dont exit with a 0 exit code are saying "i had an
>>> error". i'd bet there are quite a few that dont do this right. this
>>> is a good opportunity to file bug reports with those apps so they
>>> clean up their act. they are just like functions that do this:
>>>
>>> int dothing(int blah) {
>>>    // do thing here
>>>    return;
>>> }
>>>
>>> it's a bug. we shouldnt be hiding bugs. we should be bringing them
>>> out and passing them to the right place to be fixed - in this case
>>> the apps in question. :)
>>>
>>> just saying that we could have a less intrusive way of
>>> logging/notifying the user than a dialog they have to dismiss in the
>>> middle of their screen. :)
>>
>> I meant "now you tell me after I wrote that dialog years ago according
>> to your desires at the time".  lol
>
> thats what i said - dialog is fine. we have no alternative mechanism right 
> now.
> we'd need a nice log + notification thing. we probably want one in the end
> anyway. but what you did was just fine.
>

Since there is no configuration option to suppress the output how 
difficult would it be for me to simply patch it out of E for now? Any 
tips on where to look in the code base?

Thanks,
Tex.

P.S. Gratuitous screen shot of our new PCLinuxOS Enlightenment ISO.
http://i52.tinypic.com/n69ngl.png

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest
Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in  U.S. and Canada
$10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing
Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to