On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday 18 April 2011 19:47:30 Karl Sinn wrote: >> > > It would be really great to have one :) >> > >> > It certainly would :) but I don't see it happening anytime soon. The >> > webkit port of efl still needs lots of work :( >> >> Is there a way to motivate all the E17 heros (programmers) to focus on this >> for some time? ;) > > There's already a relatively large number of mail clients out there to suit > different requirements of functionality and taste. Why is an e17 client > necessary/desired? Is it wise for devs to divert scarce time to develop a 'me > too' application, or is there some overwhelming innovation in mail client > functionality and features that is desperate to come out? > > Of course devs will do what they see fit, but I am questioning the rational > for yet another mail client application, when time and effort can be thin on > the ground.
At least I see one reason, last time I tried evolution, kmail and thunderbird on my imap server, they took around 1GB of allocated memory. That was just insane, and they where dead slow at doing anything... Oh, and I have a computer I consider should never slow down for just displaying a text (yes, most of my mail are just text). -- Cedric BAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
