On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 23:24:31 +0000 Matt B <bagnaram...@gmail.com> said:
> I had used E 0.24.x, and upon updating to the latest revision on Arch, > I noticed the added dependency on xorg & xwayland. I would rather not > pull all of these in. Is there a reason these dependencies may have > changed from optional to required in the release? I had previously run > E no problem on vanilla Wayland with no X. > > https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-community/commit/c299ed15e76d7a7bc21e1e7e4f71f60c2bf1a3de#diff-3e341d2d9c67be01819b25b25d5e53ea3cdf3a38d28846cda85a195eb9b7203a because x apps are still pretty much everywhere and having compatibility is pretty much a necessary. wayland support in e is experimental and has issues and until wayland support is good enough to totally replace x support you should always have the x support there. also i don't test with NO x11 support. i don't have time. if i'm not testing it it's probably broken. if i can get help with the wayland support to properly polish it (i just don't have time to do that and i'm focusing on things that are in x11 or are independent of x11 or wayland - those are where my time is going). -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- Carsten Haitzler - ras...@rasterman.com _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users