On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 23:32:00 +0200 Pierre Couderc via enlightenment-users <enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net> said:
> On 6/13/22 19:21, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > you could add a > > StatrupWMClass as i mentioned to make it easier to match to brave-browser. > > you can change the name of the brave desktop file. brave-browser.desktop - > > this means e's fallbacks to using class name (brave-browser) as the desktop > > file name will work (this is intentional in standards). but it seems to me > > that brave somehow is making it hard to match a window to its desktop file. > > at least for you and your packages. the aur arch packages is just fine. > > > > > Strange and interesting , I add : > > StartupWMClass=brave-browser > > to brave-browser.desktop > > > > And it is better, the result depends on "Don't show active windows" > parameter of the ibar: it can find it then - as i said. whatever you have is a "poor install" that makes it pretty impossible to match up the desktop to the window unless the pid matches and i have a suspicion the pid does not match. > If it is checked : nothing changes, the brave icon appears but instances > are not shown. > > If I uncheck it, a second brave icon appears, and I can hower on it... this means the brave browser desktop file found is not the one that was added... you have 2 of them that are different. > see https://www.tolsupport.fr/download/ttt.jpg > > (It is not important you -and me - spend time on that, it is only I do > not like these kinds of mistery...) it is important - having 2 means maybe they run different things. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- Carsten Haitzler - ras...@rasterman.com _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
