We have just gone live with a new system using 4 RBT 8500 switches and 320 RBT 4200 access points. We had some issues in the beginning when we were trying to run the 4 switches in a cluster but when we went to using the 4 as independent switches the system worked and is working flawlessly. We are using RASM to configure and maintain everything and it to is working flawlessly. We are currently running 3 vlans on the system. 1 for guest access that requires user acceptance a usage agreement via web page and the other 2 are straight production vlans. One of theses has over 800 wireless devices connected to it. Another great Enterasys product.
Thanks, Bob Hill Senior Network Engineer MCSA, MCSE+M, MCP, NCTS-VOIP, A+, ECSE University Medical Center 1800 W. Charleston Blvd. Las Vegas, NV 89102 [email protected] (702) 671-6123 office (702) 671-6510 fax "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes"? -----Original Message----- From: Jon Ambrosia [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 6:54 AM To: Enterasys Customer Mailing List Subject: RE:[enterasys] enterasys digest: April 05, 2009 Hi Zoltan, What I meant is we have only one Wireless Service (SSID) created using RASM that uses WPA/TKIP. A packet capture is a great idea. The equipment is located at a remote site. It looks like I will need to make time to go back down there. Thanks for your input. Jon Ambrosia * Network Support Group, San Diego Community College District * SunGard Higher Education Managed Services * 9315 Hillery Drive, San Diego California 92126 *Tel 619-388-1164 * Fax 619-388-1195 * [email protected] CONFIDENTIALITY: This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information, and unauthorized disclosure or use is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email from your system. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Enterasys Customer Mailing List digest [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 9:15 PM To: enterasys digest recipients Subject: enterasys digest: April 05, 2009 ENTERASYS Digest for Sunday, April 05, 2009. 1. Re: DHCP issues with new RBT-8210/AP1602C deployment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: DHCP issues with new RBT-8210/AP1602C deployment From: Zoltan Ori <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 00:20:15 -0400 X-Message-Number: 1 John, I'm confused about your deployment of "Open Access network using WPA/TKIP". WPA/TKIP would more likely be used in 802.1x access. Perhaps you can provide more details on your configs. Using Wireshark or some other sniffer on one of the laptops that works and one that doesn't might provide you with more info on the DHCP requests and responses. Zoltan On Friday 03 April 2009 18:26, Jon Ambrosia wrote: > Hello everyone. We just completed our first deployment of an RBT-8210 > wireless switch with seven (7) 1602 AP's all configured using the RASM > software. The deployment is all located on a local subnet, no VLAN tagging > no layer 3 required between the controller, AP's and Windows 2003 DHCP > server. Everything is connected directly to an SSR-8600. The deployment is > very "out of the box" with little or no customization. Basically just one > Open Access network using WPA/TKIP. > > Everything seemed to be to be working fine initially. We then noticed that > some older Fujitsu laptops are not receiving DHCP addresses. The requests > are timing out and APIPA is used. You can see them listed in RASM under > client connections but with invalid IPs. Then we noticed that iPhones were > not receiving IP addresses. Some laptops including newer Fujitsu Lifebooks > work fine. > > The DHCP server being used services ~250 wired clients with no problems and > has been for many years. So I am confident in eliminating the DHCP server > as the problem. > > I have a case open with GTAC but progress is developing slowly. I have > spent a significant amount of time reading the RASM documentation but > nothing has turned up. > > Anyone have any ideas or settings to check? Seen behavior like this before? > Any information would be greatly appreciated. > > Thank you. > --- > To unsubscribe from enterasys, send email to [email protected] with the > body: unsubscribe enterasys [email protected] --- END OF DIGEST --- To unsubscribe from enterasys, send email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe enterasys [email protected] --- To unsubscribe from enterasys, send email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe enterasys [email protected] ________________________________________ This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original. -University Medical Center of Southern Nevada --- To unsubscribe from enterasys, send email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe enterasys [email protected]
