Hi,

We have microsoft NLB to.

I must say this was a little bit tricky. First we used unicast NLB and
this flooded all ports on the same vlan. But then we configured
igmpsnooping and set the servers to use multicast with IGMP. The flood
stopped and the servers work fine as before. I advise you to try the same.


Best regards,
Hugo Veiga



Em 5/2/2011 6:05 AM, Sheil,Sean M escreveu:
> We had an issue with the Microsoft NLB that was causing an arp flood.
> We had other issues that I cannot fully explain at this point.  Our
> network has been very stable for many years.  In essence, this NLB
> problem had been going on for quite some time, however with additional
> devices hitting OWA and our web server the problem finally hit a
> breaking point.  The budget constraints are tied to purchasing the
> additional licenses for routing.
>
> Sean
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Olive [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 4:17 AM
> To: Enterasys Customer Mailing List
> Subject: RE:[enterasys] Configuration question
>
> Sean
>
> What was the issue that caused you to re-think your routing strategy?
>
> And what budget constraint implies that you must use static routes as
> opposed to a dynamic routing policy?
>
>
> Billo
> Data Communications Co-Ordinator
> Information Technology&  Telecommunications
> Hunter New England Health Service
> ph 0249 213804 fax 0249 213038
> [email protected]
> ________________________________________
> From: Sheil,Sean M [[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, 30 April 2011 2:58 PM
> To: Enterasys Customer Mailing List
> Subject: [enterasys] Configuration question
>
> Hi all,
>
>          We have a 99% Enterasys network.  At our core we are replacing
> our dfe blades with an S4.  Three years ago, I move all of the routing
> from the edge devices (E1's) to the core.  Everything had run fine until
> an issue occurred recently.  Now the thought process has been to move
> the routing back out to the edge devices using static routes.  I am
> looking for external advise on the pros and cons of making this change.
> We have 40+ subnets/vlans.  The remote buildings will have a G3 at the
> entrance with 2 - 3 E1's stacked behind.  At some point in time, we have
> had up to 13K devices connect to our network.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sean
> ---
> Sean M. Sheil, GSEC-Gold
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Northwest Missouri State University
> 660.541.3021
>
>
> ---
> To unsubscribe from enterasys, send email to [email protected] with the
> body: unsubscribe enterasys [email protected]
>
> ---
> To unsubscribe from enterasys, send email to [email protected] with the
> body: unsubscribe enterasys [email protected]
>
> ---
> To unsubscribe from enterasys, send email to [email protected] with the body: 
> unsubscribe enterasys [email protected]
> .
>


________________________________

UBI amiga do ambiente: Antes de imprimir este e-mail pense bem se tem mesmo que 
o fazer. As árvores são um bem imprescindível.

---
To unsubscribe from enterasys, send email to [email protected] with the body: 
unsubscribe enterasys [email protected]

Reply via email to