Hi Nick,

To answer the on-topic question, ESR 45 and regular 45 are expected to have
the same features.  That means that the per-cookie acceptance dialogs will
not be in ESR 45.

Unfortunately, I don't have any recommendations for a replacement add-on.
I'm sure that if the demand is there, something will emerge as the best
option.

-- Mike

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Nick Boyce <[email protected]> wrote:

> In the light of the recent helpful comments made by Mozilla personnel
> ("Add-on Signing In ESR" thread) on the issue of "add-on signing
> enforcement control preference" retention in the ESR release channel (for
> which many thanks), I'm wondering : can we have a statement from Mozilla as
> to whether or not the removal of the code providing fine grained cookie
> control will be applied to the ESR channel ?
>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=606655
>
> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/16/02/04/2221204/firefox-44-deletes-fine-grained-cookie-management
>
> Speaking personally, I activate the cookie controls (switch on the "Ask me
> every time" option) on almost every single instance of FF that I ever
> install, along with NoScript, whether at home, at work, or for friends -
> except for the very few friends or managers who have no understanding of
> the web and just want to surf unharassed by arcane browser prompts.
>
> For the sake of clarity, I'm talking about *this* feature, which is still
> currently available in ESR (albeit deeply buried), but which is now
> apparently scheduled to be removed as from RR version 44 :
> "Tools | Options | Privacy | History | Use custom settings for history |
> Accept cookies | Keep until | Ask me every time".
>
> FWIW, the above removal bug has numerous comments from Mozilla staff to
> the effect that the code is unmaintained and causes frequent crashes.  My
> personal experience is that while the feature is a little flaky (e.g.
> checking "Apply my decision to all cookies from this site" often doesn't
> work), it has never obviously been responsible for crashing the browser.
>
> If I had my wish, I'd rather somebody were tasked to fix the flakiness,
> rather than working on removing this very useful feature.
>
> If, however, the feature is indeed doomed, then could we please have some
> clarification of the Mozilla staff bug comments to the effect that "such
> functionality is better provided by one of the existing Firefox add-ons" ?
> There are many such add-ons ... I've tried a few, but not found any so far
> that hit the spot enough for me to want to always install.  As we all know,
> keeping the set of installed add-ons as small as possible is the path to
> browsing happiness :)
>
> Is Mozilla able to recommend any particular add-on ?
> Sorry for the noise if the answer to all this is already documented
> somewhere - please just send me a link.
>
> Thanks,
> Nick Boyce
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Enterprise mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to
> [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe"
>
_______________________________________________
Enterprise mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise

To unsubscribe from this list, please visit 
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to 
[email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Reply via email to