It seems to me that automatic update of *any* software would *not* be
acceptable to some enterprises. Don't some enterprises run acceptance
tests on a new version of software before deploying it? Even if the new
version simply fixes a bug, rather than modifying overt behavior,
changes can give rise to extra Help Desk calls. What some might
consider The Right Thing others might consider disruptive.

Personally, I *never* allow automatic updates to software I use. I've
been doing software development of various kinds for decades, and I
always want to know what and why changes are made before I install
them. The reason I use ESR is exactly because it *doesn't* change out
from under me. (Except for the recent Add-On disaster, of course.)



On Fri, 31 May 2019 17:26:22 +0100
Nick Boyce <nick.bo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 28 May 2019 at 13:48, Jim Mathies <jmath...@mozilla.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 10:39 AM Nick Boyce <nick.bo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 23:00, Jim Mathies <jmath...@mozilla.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Currently Firefox updates by downloading
> >> > update files internally while Firefox is running. We've added
> >> > support for downloading via the Windows BITS service in 68.
> >> [...]
> >> I'd be very interested if there's anything you can say as to *why*
> >> Mozilla is doing this.  Why not just continue with the Mozilla
> >> home-baked mechanism
> >
> > This will allow us to cut down on the prompting we currently
> > do to do updates, which we get regular negative feedback on
> 
> Okay, sounds good - we all like software that just automagically does
> The Right Thing without bothering us with questions, though I'd have
> assumed the home-grown update mechanism could be similarly modified.
> 
> > and it will keep installed  versions of Firefox that haven't
> > been opened by the user in a while fully up to date and safe.
> 
> Ahaa - anything that might eliminate those pesky offers from FF to
> "reset" itself because "It looks like you haven't started Firefox for
> a while" is fine with me :-).
> 
> I shall just hope that the randomly-notice-update-availability issue
> is also improved by this project.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Nick Boyce
_______________________________________________
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise

To unsubscribe from this list, please visit 
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to 
enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Reply via email to