Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved

[Harry (lists)]

on 4/4/01 9:15 PM, Dan Crevier at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> The updaters are behaving as intended.  They are designed to be
> conservative.  If the user has messed with the files, there's no telling
> what the result of their modifications plus the SR modifications will result
> in.

Fair enough - but it doesn't address that this information should be
conveyed in the associated documentation.

Harry


-- 
To unsubscribe:               <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To search the archives: 
          <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>