On 5/28/03 9:47 PM, "Paul Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Than you, but how did they do this? It was not a BCC. Don't tell me they >> used an app to individually create and send one email at a time. >> >> Brent > > > Why do you keep saying "It was not a BCC". of course it was a BCC - a mass > mailing of BCCs, no doubt. the whole point about BCC addresses is that they > don't appear in the recipient's headers. (Or shouldn't: OE 5 used to do it > when sending groups, but it was wrong. Email clients are not supposed to, > and don't.) The fact that you don't see a BCC header is a good thing - if > you did, you would also see the other 1000 BCC email addresses, and so would > everyone else. But I think you're missing something that Brent originally said, namely that the TO: pane read "Colleague" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. That email address is Brent's email address. If it were truly a BCC to him, his email address wouldn't appear anywhere, let alone in the TO: pane, would it? Beth -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
