On 1/29/04 5:59, "David Stubblebine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> This is nowhere near the type of results I get with the Entourage spam
>>> filter, set to the maximum level. How do others fare? Does anyone use
>>> SpamSieve?
>>
>> I do. Couldn't live without it. 99.4% accurate since 12/10/03. Spam is a
>> non-issue for me.
>
> Buy SpamSieve. You'll rarely think about spam again once you get it
> trained.
I don't want to "rarely think about it", because there are always false
positives, and I always have to check what is flagged as spam no matter
what... It would be nice to have fewer false positives, but I can't throw
everything away without checking.
Kirk
My new e-book: Take Control of Users and Accounts in Panther
http://www.tidbits.com/takecontrol/panther/users.html
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.mcelhearn.com . . . . . .
. . Kirk McElhearn | Chemin de la Lauze | 05600 Guillestre | France . .
--
To unsubscribe:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
old-archive:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
