On 30/1/04 2:03 pm, "Peter C.S. Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's a nice idea, but the Entourage JMF is just junk. I'd guess half of what > it marks as junk is a false positive. I turned it off. My experience of the JMF turned up to almost 'max' is that it results in about 2% false positives. I average about 200 emails per day of which about 100 are junk, so 4% of genuine email is misidentified. I regard this as OK and where I see a pattern I try to improve matters with rules. I don't believe any spam device is 100% effective when looked at over a longish period. -- IT Matters - A consultancy for getting value from your investment in IT Tony Crooks IT Matters 53 Mendip Avenue EASTBOURNE BN23 8HP Tel: +44 (0)1323-460789 Fax: +44 (0)1323-460789 <mailto: 'Tony Crooks', [EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
