On 5/15/04 6:42 AM, "Scott Haneda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wanted to post in detail my experience and what I consider to be a > acceptable solution to me in regards to anti-aliased issued with Entourage > 2004. I have summarized in this link: <http://newgeo.com/monaco//> > > Thanks to everyone who helped me on this one! > > Perhaps a short snip of all this could be put to the MVP pages so others can > figure out how to deal with this if they are the type to care. > > For future reference, the entire thread is here: > <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg14106.htm > l> Scott, I tried to view your page but I think that the URL above (http://newgeo.com/monaco//) is wrong or you haven't posted it yet. I am using an old imac G3 and old eyes. With the resolution set to 1024 x 768 (to get more info on the screen), I've had to set the size of my plain text display to Monaco 14. In fact, when I viewed the web page that you had set up to show the differences in the Monaco 9 display (newgeo.com/e), I had real trouble seeing those differences. What I'm saying is, not everybody will select Monaco 9, so this will not be a universal issue. Since the display differences cannot be easily changed, could I recommend Lucida Sans Typewriter as a possible replacement? It is monospaced and has the same width as Monaco, but the height is slightly less. Using a size 10 font would not be that different in size than the Monaco 9, and perhaps this would help. Please report the URL for your solution, as I'm curious about how you resolved this issue. -- Bruce ____________________________________________________ B R U C E K. klutch-at-erols.com -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
