Beth, Kouta,
I think it is in the red oak group. It is definitely not sawtooth oak- it’s bark is very different and it is in the white oak group. Will F. Blozan President, Eastern Native Tree Society President, Appalachian Arborists, Inc. _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Beth Koebel Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 5:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [ENTS] Re: Oak ID Kouta, I also thought it could Sawtooth oak (Q. acutissima). Beth "He plants trees to benefit another generation." --Caecilius Statius --- On Fri, 12/12/08, Beth Koebel <[email protected]> wrote: From: Beth Koebel <[email protected]> Subject: [ENTS] Re: Oak ID To: [email protected] Date: Friday, December 12, 2008, 4:04 PM Kouta, You could try asking Guy Sternberg at Starhill Forest. He is a member of the International Oak Society and has a great knowledge of oaks. http://www.starhillforest.com/ Beth "He plants trees to benefit another generation." --Caecilius Statius --- On Fri, 12/12/08, Kouta Räsänen <[email protected]> wrote: From: Kouta Räsänen <[email protected]> Subject: [ENTS] Re: Oak ID To: "ENTSTrees" <[email protected]> Date: Friday, December 12, 2008, 3:09 PM Will, Thanks for your reply! Yes, maybe Asian then. It is for sure not any japanese species, and I cannot find any match from the Flora of China (however, I did not collect leaves, I have only the photos). Kouta --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org You are subscribed to the Google Groups "ENTSTrees" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
