Hey, > On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 03:11 +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote: > > I've just commited some changes to the thumbnails pane. Now it uses > > the navigator widget which makes it easier to scroll and view the > > image collection. Some pending issues on thumbnails pane: > > I just took a quick look at it. It looks nice, but I think that the > scrolling needs acceleration. For large image collections it is a bit > difficult to browse using the navigator's bar.
What do you mean with acceleration? Scrolling quicker or scrolling longer when pressing side buttons? Keyboard accelerators? > > - The current shadow effect look nice only on images with colored > > background. On small images (i.e icons, cliparts) with transparent > > background the shadow looks strange. Try viewing /usr/share/pixmaps > > and you'll see what I mean. EOG should use the same shadow style than > > nautilus because we'd have more consistency and better thumbnail > > appearance (for any kind of image). I'll experiment this and see how > > it looks. > > Other problem I see with it is that it sucks a lot of CPU on generating > the shadows. I sysprof'd it under big stress and the CPU consumption of > thumbnailing is mostly during the cycles which create the shadows. Don't > know how does nautilus shadows behave with this, but the fact that > nautilus create the shadows only when loading the window and not in a > lazy-loading way like eog, relieves a lot. Yes, you're right. I'm just trying to find a lighter way to generate (maybe simpler) shadows. If it continues to suck, we stay with the good old solid 1px black border. ;-) Cheers! --lucasr _______________________________________________ Eog-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/eog-list
