On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 17:17 -0300, Claudio Saavedra wrote: > Andre, > > Forwarding to the appropriate list, thanks for the concern and your > work! > > Claudio > email message attachment, "Forwarded message - lots of useless EOG > stacktraces" > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > From: Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: lots of useless EOG stacktraces > > Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:15:00 +0100 > > > > [in reference to: http://blogs.gnome.org/view/aklapper/2006/12/06/0 ] > > > > > > hej folks, > > a lot of EOG crash reports are totally useless (137 needinfo bugs in the > > last 2 weeks) and have totally useless stacktraces (e.g. totally empty > > stacktraces like http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381577 ). > > > > if i would ask the reporter to install additional debug packages, which > > ones do you need for gnome-commander? > > gtk, glib, libgnomeui, libgnome, pango, gnome-vfs? > > anything i've forgotten, or definitely not needed? enlighten me! :-) > > (unfortunately ubuntu (where the most reports come from) does not have > > debug packages for EOG itself.)
Depending on the version, you should recommend to install also libgnomeprint debug packages, because eog < 2.17.2 requires it. I think that would be all. Claudio -- Claudio Saavedra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Eog-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/eog-list
