On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 15:22 +0300, Lucas Rocha wrote: > Hi Claudio, > > 2007/6/24, Claudio Saavedra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 19:25 +0300, Lucas Rocha wrote: > > > > > > - Don't spend much time working on the stable branch. Prioritize > > > things you can fix in trunk in the new code base. If there's no easy > > > fix for a bug in stable branch, don't work on that. We need to make > > > EOG shine for 2.20 release. > > > > Ok to resolve FIXED the following bugs then? > > > > http://live.gnome.org/EyeOfGnome/EogNg/FixedCrashers > > Yes, please. > > I'm not sure what makes more sense: closing as WONTFIX (from stable > branch perspective) or FIXED (from development branch perspective). > I've been using the former.
I used FIXED for those clearly related to the job managing system and other obsolete bits of code. I closed *a lot* of bugs. More than I would've imagined. There are still some others which need some triagging (they may be related to accessibility, for example), but at least we're under the 75 bugs :-) Claudio -- Claudio Saavedra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Eog-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/eog-list
