Robert Meier wrote:
>
> --- Bob Sull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Robert Meier wrote:
> >
> > > Or maybe Canon was too conservative with their
> > > numbers. Also Nikon seems to have a few advantages
> > > over Canon.
> >
> > Like what?
>
> According to a previous message
> 1) Nikon's VR starts up faster then Canon's IS
> 2) can automatically detect panning
> 3) can pan in both vertical and horizontal direction
> (not sure about that, though)
>
> Also some people say that IS gives more then 2 stops
> improvement. So maybe the optimistic 3 stops from
> Nikon is closer to reality then the conservative 2
> stops from Canon.
>
Thanks. I missed the previous posts.
I haven't been following the IS stuff too closely and I didn't realize
that the IS had to start up. I thought that when it was turned on it
was always ready, maybe that is the start up time I'll review the
articles.
Thanks again.
Bob
--
//////
( 0 0 )
-73 de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Living in the last year of the 20th Century and 2nd Millennium.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
