> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:03:37 +0200 (EET)
> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hugo_G=E4vert?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: EOS Studio with only Canon EX flashes?!?
> 
> On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Michael Quack wrote:
> > Too expensive. I do use studio flash where viable, but
> > for small budgets I'd rather go with cheap mains powered
> > slaves. Gives you more lights at less cost.
> > One drawback though, you will need a flash meter.
> 
> I already have the 550EX, and 420EX (ot 2) isn't that expesive when
> compared to the main powered slaves and a flash meter. At least I've not
> seen cheap enough flash system. They all seem to be quite expensive in the
> end - or I don't have the slightest idea of what kind of flashes you are
> talking about! 8-)

Monitor http://www.photoquack.de/tutorials/diylights.htm
I am working on the translation, and have links to more 
pages with a lot more detail to that.
 
>>>1) Is 420EX really powerfull enough for 
>>> umbrellas and/or softboxes?
> >
> > Yes, it is up to some extent, but it is entirely
> > the wrong tool for the job.
> 
> Why?

Because TTL in all flavors renders different power output 
with different position of your subject, and it only works 
well with average subject contrast. To achieve strong
contrasts and modulate your subject precisely you need 
fixed power output and a flash meter. TTL is not able to 
do this without massive manipulation or nasty surprises.

So to make a very differentiated stunning light you will 
need a flash meter anyway, and I highly recommend a handheld 
meter for everyone striving to control his tonal range 
on top of that. You can do with test shots on a D30, in 
fact I rarely use my flash meter anymore.

Shoe mount flashes are not made for continuous use. You 
will have a lot of hassle to always have fresh batteries.
Mains operated slaves save you from that.
 
> > No TTL or E-TTL metering, though.
> > (Who needs that?)
> I do. Or should I say, I think I need the multi-group E-TTL...

No. You need a reproducable, calculatable output.
In camera metering is nice for flat lighting from 
the camera, but it doesn't do much good elsewhere.

> > Oh my. TTL, A-TTL or E-TTL and studio don't mix well.
> > In fact they don't mix at all.
> Again, why? Please give some reasons why they don't 
> mix at all. 

Because you lose control over what you are doing, and in 
situations with high contrasts you can almost be sure that 
the transmitter won't trigger the remote flash.

You might want to do slight adjustments and see what 
the difference is. TTL metering will level most of 
your sophisticated light. Precise, reproducable manual 
settings preserve it.

-- 
Michael Quack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to