Hi,
I'm in the same situation.
Have you tried taking pictures with both lenses?
I have, but in different light conditions for both lenses, so it might not
be revealing, but the 20mm seemed to be extremely sharp. The pictures I got
from it are impressive in contrast/sharpness, while the pictures taken with
the 20-35 seem muddier, but again, it might be the light conditions, film,
etc...
I think my first choice goes to the 20mm, but I would prefer the zoom if
it's as sharp... which it probably can't be.
Pierre
At 10:33 2/9/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm (still) trying to decide on a wide angle zoom for 35mm.
>The 20/2.8 has a 72mm thread and rates the same as the
>20-35/3.5-4.5, which has 77mm threads, but what looks
>like the same size front element.
>
>Has anyone used the Cokin P system for 20mm?
>Should I expect vignetting?
>Is the difference in close-focus significant?
>
>Cheers
>Julian Loke
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
