If you cannot compensate for lag time anyway (except in the good advice
of using a flash to freeze the subject below, which would still work
with this suggestion), why not just take two cable releases, duct tape
them back to back, and squeeze both buttons between thumb and forefinger
when you want to take the shot? Given sufficient finger pressure and
fast application, this should be engaging them close enough to make any
difference less than the shutter lag time anyway. If you find that one
of the releases fires a small fraction of a second earlier than the
other, just use this on the slower body, then it would actually
partially compensate for the lag time difference.
Sorry if this suggestion has already been offered, but I haven't
followed extremely closely (I got a little lost in some of the
electronic theory and had to skip a few posts).
Mike
Gary Fisher wrote:
> Another possible (but limiting) solution would be the
> use of flash to make the exposure. Obviously where
> ambient light levels are high this will have warts on
> it, but at low light levels where the main lighting
> would result from flash output, one of the cameras
> could be rigged to fire a flash (or flash array).
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
