It is probably the difference between "contrast" and "sharpness" as mentioned in the photodo tests (this is the difference between thier 10 lpmm and their 40 lpmm tests). See their link from one of the test pages that says "about the mtf charts' or whatever, for an explanation and, i think pictures of the difference. mike Pierre Bellavance wrote: > > Wide open, strangely, the picture is muddier with the 20 than with the > 20-35, but at the same time text is easier to read...!!! Try to explain this... * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5... Pierre Bellavance
- EOS 100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS Kim
- Re: EOS 100-400 f4.5-5.6L I... Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Gary Fisher
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5... Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5... Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Jim Davis
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5... Ken Lin
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5... Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5... M.J.Shupe
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 M.J.Shupe
- EOS Canon website & Daniel Rocha Robert Meier
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 M.J.Shupe
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Vicente
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Willem-Jan Markerink
