Hi all -
OK, I am NOT trying to start a flame war here or anything, but I'm
curious about something. One of the things that convinces me that
digital will never completely supplant analog film photography is the
fact that film is a medium, and that one of the joys and practical
benefits of film cameras is the variety of things you can do with
different films. Not just film speeds, which I understand digitals
can reproduce, but color bias, texture, VC vs NC, that sort of thing.
When I go out to shoot, I'm very aware of which film I'm shooting that
day, and what it's biases are. Or at least I'm learning about that.
Some I know pretty well.
How does that feel with a digital camera? Is it an issue, something
you miss? Is it possible to compare the basic image quality to one of
the known films? What results do you get using different temperature
photo floods? I know you can do lots of PS manipulation, and maybe
even bias the camera different ways, but I'm very curious about these
angles While I'm sure film will always be my first choice, I'm also
sure I'll eventually buy a digital camera, and at my present level of
understanding this is a key question.
Ken Durling
Website http://home.earthlink.net/~kdurling/
Alternate e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
