Tom DelRosario wrote:
>
> Maybe it's time to finish that table in EOSDOC cross referencing
> ALL EOS camera bodies (film, digital):
> http://eosdoc.com/manuals.asp?q=bodies
>
> I got the table to render at width 640 without scrolling. Now to
> clean up the formatting...
>
> Do you agree with the segmentation into Top/High/Mid/Basic/Value?
>
> Cheers
> Julian Loke
>
Julian, you ask the question on the DOC, "Where did the A2 name come
from?" In my opinion, it was to emphasize the linearity from the old FD
mount cameras. The pro F1 begat the pro EOS 1, thus the A-1, top
consumer camera, begat the A2. Of course, this bypasses the "T" series,
not to mention the 600 series and 10s AF cameras, but what the heck!
Skip
--
Shadowcatcher Imagery
http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************