>does anyone here have direct experience with the Canon EF 70-200 f4 L
>USM? How does it compare to the f2.8 version, and to the old 70-210 f4
>non "L" non USM? I'm considering getting this lens for my wife, who has
>developed an overriding emphasis on sharpness. Is it worth the roughly
>(new) $600 price of entry?
>Skip
I have it and it's a very good lens. Very sharp (even wide open), silent,
good build quality, not to heavy...
I don't know the other versions, but I really recommand it.
The only "bad" things for me are the color (black would have been more
sober) and the fact that the tripod collar is optional. No big deal...
Olivier
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
