In a message dated 6/11/01 11:31:10 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Which one is best for you? Only you can tell. Warm regards, Jonathan Kwok >> Hi Jonathan, Great review! I have a follow-up question. Did you ever try Canon 100-400L IS lens? What's your opinion? How does it compare to 70-200L 2.8 with and without TCs? I'm trying to make up my mind if I should stick with a faster lens and TCs, but no IS, or go for the big zoom with IS? It'd be used on 1n body, mostly for wildlife and equestrian sports. Or do you think I'd get away with Canon 75-300 USM IS - I rarely blow up my photos above 11x14inch. If anyone else on the list has any comments/ideas - please do tell.:o) Thanks George My web page: http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
