On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 7/30/01 10:46:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> << Also the pattern of the EOS 50e
> > (Elan IIe) is such that
> > the outhermost large are covers both the sky and the
> > ground in landscapes
> > and that's why, IMHO, it does not expose even the
> > simplest landscape
> > pictures very well.
>
> Agreed. >>
> Hi,
> How about older EOS bodies, like 630/RT? They have a simple pattern too, but
> I always got better results with those vs. ElanIIE - that's why I sold
> ElanIIE a long time ago, but still have my RT and love using it. So, what
> makes RT expose so much better. And back when I had 630 (which I traded for
> 1n later) it did better than ElanIIE as well.
Don't know. Maybe the pattern is better... I don't remember how the
pattern was on those cameras. I do recall that the pattern on EOS 1, would
enable the camera to recognize the effect of the sky in the picture for
instance... but it's a long time ago when I had a chance to use EOS 1...
Best regards,
Hugo.
************************************************************
** Hugo G�vert **
** [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hut.fi/~hugo **
************************************************************
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
