> I'm a self-same amateur (if you mean amateur as in "beginner" -
> if you don't then don't read on :-)
Hi Mark-
(I'm an amateur in that I don't make my living taking pictures. But not a
beginner really, as I've been shooting for about 10 years. But that
doesn't mean I haven't a lot to learn.)
I guess for $280, I should just get the 100-300 USM and shoot a roll or
two and see how I like it. I just have a feeling all those opinions would
be right.
I think I'll opt out on the 70-200 IS as street price looks to be around
$2,000-2,400 US dollars. And *maybe* 1,700 a few yrs. down the road.
I've got a Winston Cup race this month that I'm going to and would like to
take something other than my 80-200.
-Green
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
