> From: "Tom Pfeiffer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I've seen a couple of ads for this lens but not seen a review in any of the > mags. Did I miss one somewhere? It's sounds pretty exciting, 5mm wider than No, AFAIK it's still very new. > my 20-35 USM and about the same price. I might forgo my ambitions of a 17-35 > 2.8L and keep the 20-35 if the new Sigma turns out to be any good. It's > designated as a DF/DG lens (DF=dual focus, DG=???), and doesn't have the HSM > drive. Check out: http://www.sigma-photo.com/Html/pages/15_30_ex.htm DG = optimized for digital cameras with sensors smaller than 24x36mm. Main concern is that corner sharpness and distortion level on 35mm slides could be bad. :( And...a NON-removable lens hood, cool ;) BlueSky * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
