how much is much less? and where did you get it?
_____________________________________ Thanks, Mehrdad [-----Original Message----- [From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ray Amos [Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 4:56 PM [To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Subject: Re: EOS Re: FYI: 70-200IS at B&H for $2K (NIM) [ [ [Gary Russell wrote: [> [> -----Original Message----- [> From: Ray Amos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [> [> >Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video wrote: [> >> [> >> At 04:13 PM 09/26/2001, you wrote: [> >> >In stock? [> >> [> >> Yes. [> > [> >Is the quoted price correct? If you need to e-mail me privately, feel [> >free. [> [> Ray if I'm reading your question correctly, the new EF 70-200 IS [is listed [> at $1,999.95 (US Warrantee) on B&H's web site and it's [availability reflects [> the lens is in-stock. I see the "old" non-IS 70-200 runs [$1,199.95...that [> must be a doozie of an image stabilization system for $800 extra! [> [> Gary Russell [> [ [In my opinion there's more to it than just the IS system. First, my new [lens is much less than $1,995. And it "is" a dozy of an image [stabilization system. Three stops in lieu of two and the ability to use [it while tripod mounted will do for starters. Three stops is like [having a f/1 or f/1.2 lens if you handhold. If you would take the time [to read the available website reviews, you might find many other [advancements. Plus, all it takes is that one special image that you [would not have gotten without IS and it's worth it. I don't think there [are many on this list who would not pay $500. or $600. for that shot. [Quite frankly, I've spent much more than that trying to make that [special image. [ [Ray Amos [* * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
