I'll confine myself to saying that the EF 200 f2.8L is one of Canon's sharpest lenses, with high contrast and good colour rendition, and was my first L lens. Haven't used the others. Have you considered getting a 1.4x converter? I guess Canon's are best although limited in application, but independent ones give you more flexibility.
Malcolm Milton Keynes, UK ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:00 PM Subject: EOS Telezoom dilemma > Hi fellow listmembers, snip > so great. Since I would not mind spending a few euros more I'm currently > considering the 200/2.8 (second hand), 80-200/2.8 (second hand, obviously) > and 70-200/4 (new, seems impossible to find second hand in the > Netherlands). All these lenses are in the same price range. The 200 prime snip * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
