> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 10:51:54 +0200 > From: Bleuer Csaba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Subject: EOS Telezoom dilemma > > Hi, > > I Have a 100-300/4.5-5.6 USM. I am very satisfied with it. It is much > cheaper than those you mention, but some say, that it is not so goo > optically. It has some advantages. 58mm filter thread, non > rotating front > element, little weight. > > I use it for portraits, mostly candid, but sometimes people > recognise my > intention. As I see there is no long enough lens for candid > portraits. :-))) > > Csaba
Or short enough! Most people don't know the existence of wide-angle lenses. If you use a 20mm and frame you're subject near the side, most people suppose they're not even in the picture. Stefan. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
