--- Stefan Gerris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm new to this mailing list and must admit I like
> the (generally)
> professional attitude of the participants. So I hope
> I'm not trying to
> dig out an old bone by asking the following
> question.
> 
> I'm looking for a good tele-zoom 
snip

I have the following options:
> 
> 70-200 f/4 USM L
> OR
> 75-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM
> 
> 
> Is it correct that the 70-200 f/4 USM L will be
> taken out of the
> collection soon?

First, I haven't heard anything about the 70-200 f/4
being discontinued.

As for which of the other two lenses to choose, I'd
say it depends on your needs.  Are you going to shoot
primarily 4x6 snapshots, with an occasional
enlargement to 5x7 or 8x10? Do you never, or rarely,
use a polarizing filter?  And are most of your shots
of static objects? If so, you might find the 75-300
works fine.

But if you're going to project transparencies, or make
serious enlargements, the better optical quality of
the L lens is worth it.

And if you use a polarizer a lot, you'll quickly get
tired of the rotating front element of the 75-300.

And if you shoot a lot of action, you'll find the
faster focus of the L lens to be a big help.  And IS
won't help make moving subjects sharper anyway.

HTH,

=====
Bob Meyer
I wish I knew what I know now, when I was younger...

http://www.meyerweb.net/epson

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to