"Craig Zendel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to: >Incidentally, I prefer the AWB portrait to the CWB. It may not be correct, >but I don't give a *$!% (Quackism?).
Outdoors shooting nature, AWB is working well for me. I seldom have to but I usually do a slight tweak to some photos. I'm not printing hundreds from each shoot, nor making hundreds up for a webpage or client either. I might be lucky to get more than one real nice shot in a day. So having to adjust is no big deal. Setting it in camera just makes no sense to me. But i can see it for consistancy in other shooting situations. I haven't used the 10d for much other than birds photos, but I have taken the odd photo of people, landscapes, flowers, etc and the AWB has worked fabulously in all cases. Jim Davis Nature Photography http://www.kjsl.com/~jbdavis/ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
