As Gary Fisher once said, > A quick bit of calculation shows that the new 1D MkII may not only be > a boon for those who like wide angle shots, but still good for telephoto > shots as well. The Mk II's sensor size of 28.7 x 19.1 (3504x2336/8.2mp) > compared to the 10D/300D's 22.7 x 15.1 (3072x2048/6.3mp) sensor > shows that a crop of the 1DII/1D.2 [new acronyms :) ] image to the > same size as the 10D's would result in a 2271 x 1847 image (5.1mp). > > That's based on physical sensor size, not pixel count, to get (IMO) a > valid comparison....
Yup - it carries the 1.3x FoV crop sensor size from its predecessor: http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-6451-6636-6637 is the chart on the 3rd page with a nice summary of the major differences between the Mk I and Mk II. -/\/ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
