[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote/replied to: > >Your reply got through. And it made me thinking ... >I guess I still hope a full frame will be affordable in 3 years, so I could >still use the same set up as with film. > >I probably want to shoot with the 135 2 as I heard so many good stories on >it. Even if it gets a 200 mm in the next few years till full frame digital >breaks through.
Just curious what you're planning on shooting. I mean it's kind of neat to have the sharpest lens in Canon's lineup, but I dunno what how many landscapes could use it, or if it would be wasted on portraits. I love my 85/1.8, picked it up used about half price. For a longer lens I use my 100-400L IS. It's great for portraits, even though slightly heavier, the IS works great. And I sometimes but not that much use my 50/1.4. Nice lens, just only good for portraits really on the 10D. -- Jim Davis Nature Photography http://jimdavis.oberro.com Replies in plain text only please! * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
